E | l | e | c | t | i |
o | n | | |
M | e | t | h | o | d |
s | | | |
E | d | u | c | a | t |
i | o | n | & |
R | e | s | e | a | r |
c | h | | |
G | r | o | u | p |
| | | |
|
The Election Methods Education and Research Group (EMERG) was
founded by Russ Paielli and Mike
Ossipoff. Mike is an expert on election methods, and Russ is the
webmaster and content developer. We owe special thanks to Jean-Sébastien
Lebacq for translating this site into French. Our purpose is to educate
and inform the public about the gross inadequacy of our current
plurality election method and the major benefits of a better
alternative. Our focus is on single-winner election methods. [Note: the
banner above may not render as intended on all browsers.]
Much of the information on this website can be traced to the Election Methods Mailing List,
which is maintained by Rob
Lanphier. Mike Ossipoff has been active on that mailing list for
several years, and we are indebted to Rob for originating and
maintaining it. The similarity of our domain name, however, implies no
affiliation with that mailing list, nor does Rob necessarily endorse all
the views expressed here.
EMERG is a non-partisan organization. We believe that election
methods should be evaluated objectively and mathematically, without
regard to which political parties or ideologies might benefit. Although
political parties are mentioned on this website to illustrate examples,
no endorsement is intended or implied. A good election method should be
completely neutral, and it should not artificially restrict the number
of parties that can be truly competitive.
Democracy is a great experiment with no guarantee of success. The
election methods advocated on this website can improve democracy
dramatically by giving the people, to the maximum extent possible, the
kind of leaders they really prefer. However, no voting system can
guarantee that the people will vote wisely, hence we believe that
debates about which system will yield the "best" leaders are futile.
Someone once said, "The people get the government they deserve." They
get the election method they deserve too.
To forestall any possible misunderstandings, please understand that
we are absolutely not advocating majority rule or anything like
it. Majority rule without Constitutionally guaranteed individual rights
is obviously a terrible idea. The United States is not a "pure"
democracy (it is a constitutional republic), but it is a democracy to
the extent that our leaders are democratically elected. All we are
advocating is a more intelligent form of democratic elections.
If you have any questions, comments, suggestions, or corrections,
please contact us. And be sure to
check back regularly to see this website grow and improve. Above all,
please link to us and spread the word about ElectionMethods.org. Without
your help, we don't have a chance. Let's work together to improve
democracy!
ElectionMethods.org |